Rabbi Jonathan I. Rosenblatt
Rabbi
Rabbi Gidon Rothstein
Associate Rabbi
 
Our Home

Click here for back issues of Halakhah in Brief

Rabbi Gidon Rothstein's Halakhah in Brief #39

Eating at the Homes of those who don't know about Bishul.

Last week, we discussed ways of reheating food on Shabbat morning that had already become cold. A related question (and the original source of the e-mail inquiry that got me going on this topic) was what to do when we are at someone else’s house and see that they have clearly not followed these rules.

At first glance, this would seem to create problems. The Shulhan Arukh rules that if someone knowingly and deliberately cooks (or performs any other Shabbat-prohibited activity) on Shabbat, the person who cooked it may not eat the resulting food ever, but others may eat it immediately after Shabbat. If the person cooked be-shogeg (a term we’ll define in a moment), then no one may eat the food that day, but everyone may eat it immediately after Shabbat.

Interestingly, here we do not require waiting bikhdei she-ya`aseh, a concept that comes up in other halakhic contexts. The notion of bikhdei she-ya`aseh is that we have to wait enough time after Shabbat to allow for the action to have been performed in a time of heter. For example, if I had a non-Jew cook for me on Shabbat, I would have to wait after Shabbat for enough time such that that food could have been cooked beginning after Shabbat. The Mishnah Berurah points out, however, that that only applies to asking a non-Jew to cook for you, since it is such a tempting way to handle Shabbat cooking issues. Where a Jew is violating Shabbat, however, Hazal felt no need to make such an ordinance.

On the face of it, then, a Jew who went to somebody else’s house and saw that they had re-heated food improperly would have to avoid eating that food. And, indeed, my questioner mentioned that he/she had been taught in High School that it would be necessary in such a situation to only eat those foods— cold cuts, cholent— that would not have such problems.

There are, however, two forms of leniency, one provided by the Mishnah Berurah and one by mori ve-rabi Rabbi Willig (she-yihyeh le’orekh yamim tovim ve-arukhim— a few weeks ago, I used the term le-havdil bein ha-hayyim u-vein hahayyim; I believe that term is used when referring to two people, one of whom has passed away, and is based on the notion that tsadiqqim are thought of as hayyim even when having passed away. In case that’s not the right use of the term, I used the more familiar Shlit"a acronym).

The Mishnah Berurah points out that the Shulhan Arukh rules according to one of two opinions in the gemara, but there was a small, but reputable, minority of rishonim who followed a second view, according to which "others"— those who did not violate Shabbat— could benefit from the prohibition immediately as long as it is be-shogeg, done without complete knowledge. The Mishnah Berurah says that in cases of dehaq, we can rely on that view.

Shogeg for cooking on Shabbat would include not realizing that it was Shabbat (a rare occurrence for Shabbat morning), not realizing that cooking in general was prohibited on Shabbat (a more likely, but still infrequent, event) or not realizing that the action in question qualified as cooking (the most likely of the three). In our case, if someone Orthodox did not realize that reheating soup qualified as cooking, they would count as a shogeg., and others who would be forced to embarrass them by refusing to eat their food could, it seems to me, rely on those rishonim.

Even if one does not accept the line of reasoning outlined above, Rabbi Willig pointed out that the cases we have been discussing were all cases of reheating, where the food had been completely cooked prior to Shabbat (or had finished cooking on Shabbat i n a permissible way, a more complicated topic I may take up in the future). We had only gotten into problems when there was liquid in the food (or it was a liquid), and therefore created problems of bishul ahar bishul, that liquid, even though it had been cooked at one point, is considered uncooked once it completely cools. There are, however, some authorities who rule that there is no bishul ahar bishul even for a davar lah, a liquid. Once again, in a situation where the food was reheated be-shogeg, we can rely on those authorities at least not to consider it bishul be-Shabbat, so that as guests we could eat the food.

It turns out, then, that there are relatively few situations (in contemporary society) where Shabbat violation issues would prevent us from eating in someone else’s house. Certainly there are some: if we saw someone actually cook on Shabbat (from scratch), or have their non-Jewish maid do it for them, there would be good reasons to avoid eating that food on Shabbat. For most situations, though, we would be able to eat at these people’s houses. Shabbat Shalom.

IF YOU NOTICE ANY ERRORS IN THIS PRESENTATION, PLEASE BRING THEM TO MY ATTENTION.

Torah Classes

Daf Yomi

The Daf Yomi shiur meets every day following the 6:05 Minyan and concludes no later than 7:30. It meets on Shabbat 45 minutes before Mincha and on Sundays immediately following the 7:30 Minyan.


Phone: 718.548.1850 | Fax: 718.548.2307 | Email:info@RJConline.org
3700 Independence Ave. Riverdale, NY 10463

[   Home |   Services |   RJC News |   RJC Torah |   Calendar |   Photo Album  ]
[   RJC family |   Community |   Contact Us  ]

Home

Services

News

Torah

Calendar

Family

Photo Album

Our Community

Contact Us



Suggestions
webmaster@RJConline.org