Yom
Tov Sheini in Israel
The question of how many days of Yom Tov to keep if one is visiting Israel from the
Diaspora arises more frequently today than at any point in Jewish history. Nevertheless,
it did arise often enough to leave a paper trail in halakhic sources and three schools of
thought have developed. The first, following R. Yosef Karo, believes that unless one can
be defined as a resident of Israelto be defined momentarily one has to observe
two days of Yom Tov in Israel. In his responsum, R. Karo reports witnessing public
minyanim for the second day of Yom Tov, and says that they were a longstanding practice
conducted without objection in front of important rabbis. He suggests that the problem of
lo titgodedu, of not publicly observing a different custom from the host community, only
applied to holiday-prohibited labor, but not to prayers.
In a previous sheet, we saw that for at least some issues of prayers, lo titgodedu or
its equivalent applies, so the reasoning here does not seem particularly convincing. As a
further issue to consider, in the Shulhan Arukh, R. Karo mentions that a person from
Israel who is in the diaspora for Yom Tov may not violate Yom Tov publicly, but does not
mention anything about a person from the diaspora who is in Israel.
The operative question for R. Karo is whether one is still defined as a diaspora
resident following the standard halakhic categories used when deciding which of two
customs to follow. Later authorities have enunciated several leniencies in the definition.
R. Shlomo Zalman Auerback, ztll"h, held that if someone owns a residence in Israel
and has the general practice of being there for all three of the regalim, Pesah, Shavuot
and Sukkot, that person can be defined as a resident of Israel in terms of this halakhah.
Interestingly, R. Shlomo Zalman thinks that this person qualifies as a resident of Israel
even more than someone who lives six months a year in Israel, since this person
neverbarring unforeseen circumstances experiences Yom Tov in the diaspora.
Parenthetically, R. Shlomo Zalman believes that a diaspora Jew observing two days of
Yom Tov in Israel may ask an Israeli Jew to perform prohibited labors on Yom Tov. Both of
these leniencies, as well as his phrasing, suggest that R. Shlomo Zalman saw two days as a
stringency, not as the only way to view the halakhah. Just to finish our residency
leniencies, R. Ovadia Yosef believes that a bachelor who would be willing to settle in
Israel if he met the right woman regardless of his parents opposition
may also consider himself a resident of Israel.
The late 17th, early 18th century Hakham Zvi Ashkenazi formulated a completely
different approach to the issue. He notes that nowadays we all know when the right day for
Yom Tov is. The gemara, in fact, already reports that we keep two days of Yom Tov to
follow a principle known as "minhag avoteinu be-yadenu," adhering to our
forefathers customs even if the reason for it has dissipated. Hakham Zvi says that
there is no reason to think that the custom was to observe two days of Yom Tov; it was,
rather, to observe two days of Yom Tov in the diaspora. If someone had been in Israel,
even accidentally, there would be no reason to keep a second day.
How people decide between these two views today depends largely on how they view the
balance between traditionalism and critical thinking in halakhah. Certainly, the bulk of
traditional sources follow R. Karos view, but as a sevara, it has little to
recommend it. First, theres no good reason that the gemaras warning to be
careful of our forefathers customs meant that we should keep two days even in a
place where they did not. Second, the issues of lo titgodedu, as Ive written
previously, seem manifestly obvious and problematic.
The weight of tradition should not, however, be ignored. In that regard, R. Shmuel
Salant and the Rov held a middle position, called a day and a half in common parlance.
This view involves acting stringently both ways by keeping a second day, but trying
to fulfill as many of the mitsvot of the weekday and the holiday as possible (not keeping
Yom Tov, but not performing prohibited work, and trying to listen to others' kiddush,
etc.). Having acted this way many times, I can say that it does not feel particularly
satisfactory as a halakhic stance; it does, however, have the advantage of showing respect
for both points of view.
The options for those visiting Israel are therefore: 1) Two days the position of
R. Karo in his responsa, not repeated in the Shulhan Arukh, and a well-attested practice
throughout Jewish history. 2) One day the position of Hakham Zvi, with two different
areas of halakhic logic (the minhag of Yom Tov Sheini, and the issue of lo titgodedu) in
its favor. 3) One and a half a position that respects both of the others, but does
not create a meaningful experience of its own. Or stay back in America with the rest of us
and enjoy Yom Tov in the comfort of galut. Shabbat Shalom.
IF YOU NOTICE ANY ERRORS IN THIS PRESENTATION, PLEASE BRING
THEM TO MY ATTENTION. |