Bat
Mitzvah
With several rapidly approaching celebrations of a Bat-Mitsvah in our kehillah, and
given that Tamars Bat-Mitsvah is only six years away, my eyes were drawn to a
teshuva by R. Ovadia Yosef questioning whether the celebrations themselves are appropriate
as well as whether the father should recite the blessing of "barukh
she-petarani," the way he would for a boy. To avoid any trepidation as to the
conclusion, I should mention now that he rules permissively and approvingly on both
issues.
It is, however, worth mentioning that R. Moshe Feinstein, ztllh"h, denied such
celebrations the status of se`udot mitsvah he thought they were no more than a
birthday partyand preferred that they not take place in a shul , even at a time when
there was no davening going on. He repeated this belief in several teshuvot, in one of
which he explained that he believed a girl differed from a boy in that the boys
accession to adulthood produces publicly visible change in his halakhic status. The boy is
now called up to the Torah, counts for a minyan, and so on. With a girl, the outward,
public manifestations of her adulthood are lacking.
Two historical notes about this teshuva. First, it was written in 1957 (and I found no
place after 1961 that he reiterated his position, although he may well have believed it
all his life), a time when the Bat-Mitsvah ceremony appears to have been devoid of Torah
content. He was more accepting of a Shabbat morning kiddush after shul, since people make
those for all sorts of occasions, At such a kiddush, he did not mind the girls
saying a few words, particularly if the rabbi asking the question saw this as a legitimate
opportunity to bring the girl closer to Torah and mitsvot. However, he generally believed
that these occasions often lead to hillul Shabbat, and for that reason he was not
particularly comfortable with Bar-Mitsvah celebrations, either. Since he knew the long
tradition of seudot mitsvah for a Bar-Mitsvah, it seems at least possible that the context
in which he was being asked the question (America in the 1950s, when Orthodoxy was
considered a fossil) played some role in his answer. R. Ovadias, yibadel le-hayyim
tovim ve-arukim, strong support for the custom also suggests that R. Moshes
opposition is worth wondering about.
The second interesting point in R. Moshes teshuva is that in the same teshuva he
takes the position that one can use one dishwasher for meat and milk as long as one
changes the racks in between. I mention that not le-halakhah, because I have not
researched it fully, but just as an interesting view.
Getting back to Bat-Mitsvah, R. Ovadia focuses first on the form and meaning of the
berakha of barukh she-petarani (Blessed be He Who has freed me of the punishment of this
one). Because of a dispute as to whether or not to recite the blessing with the Name of
God and a mention of His Rule of the world (shem ve-malkhut), and R. Ovadias
personal doubts as to whether we recite blessings not recorded in the Talmud, and the
general tendency to avoid making unnecessary berakhot, he rules that the blessing should
be said without shem ve-malkhut.
The meaning of the blessing is also disputed one view says that the father is now
freed of the punishment he might incur by not educating his child properly, and the other
view believes that the blessing celebrates the childs new freedom from the
possibility of suffering for the sins of the parent.(Although this is not the place for
it, we should note that many sources assume that minor children might get sick or even,
rahmana litslan, pass away as a consequence of their parents sins). The second view
would certainly ratify saying the blessing at a Bat Mitsvah, since girls as much as boys
can become entrapped by their parents sins.
Even in the first view, the blessing should apply to Benot Mitsvah. Hakham Ovadia
discusses the issue, but concludes that a father is in fact just as obligated to educate
his daughters to be able to live full adult Jewish lives as he is to train his sons to
that level. He notes that some authorities include mothers in the obligation of hinukh, of
training our children to keep the mitsvot. (In fact, the Mishnah Berurah notes that many
aharonim include mothers in this obligation). He therefore says that, especially since we
do not use shem ve-malkhut in the blessing, mothers in addition to fathers (and certainly
in the absence of fathers) should recite the blessing of barukh she-petarani.
In terms of whether the meal is a seudat mitsvah, a meal that is considered a mitsvah
to join, R. Ovadia rules that it is he notes a statement of the Ben Ish Chai (who
lived in the 19th century in Baghdad, not a hotbed of feminist activity) that a seudah for
a Bat-Mitsvah is a seudat mitsvah. The Ben Ish Chai actually thought seudot to celebrate
birthdays were a Jewish concept and even was approving of holding a seudah each year on
the anniversary of ones berit, circucision. The anniversary concept as a way to give
thanks to Hashem for an important personal event, in other words, was one he accepted,
with ramifications for his positive attitude towards this particular birthday, when a
Jewish girl comes to accept her adult membership in the Jewish people. Shabbat Shalom.
IF YOU NOTICE ANY ERRORS IN THIS PRESENTATION, PLEASE BRING
THEM TO MY ATTENTION. |